High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3258/2016disposed off

Satvinder Kour v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-01-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3258 of 2016 • Satvinder Kour W/o Navneet Singh, Aged About 32 Years Proprietor Of R. K. Supplier, Bhandar, R/o House No. 16/627, Tatya Para, Phool Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh, Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Commissioner, Higher Education Department, Govt. Science College Campus, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Collector, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Executive Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Zone Commissioner No. 4, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent And WPC No. 3259 Of 2016

1. Kuldeep Singh Chawla S/o Trilok Singh Chawla, Aged About 64 Years, Proprietor Of Adarsh Kiraya Bhandar, R/o House No. 16/627, Tatya Para, Phool Chowk, Raipur, Distirct Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Jaspal Singh, S/o Jogendra Singh Hora, Aged About 35 Years Proprietor Of Amar Bharat Kiraya Bhandar, R/o Shyam Nagar Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: Deputy Director, Jan Sampark Sanchalanalaya, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Collector, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Zone Commissioner, Zone No.7, Municipal Corporation Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Assistant Labour Commissioner, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 4/1/2017

1. Petitioners have preferred these writ petitions seeking a direction to the respondents to pay outstanding dues of the petitioners along with interest @ 12%.

2. Referring to the order passed by this Court in Om Sai Traders & Tent House v. State of Chhattisgarh & others {WPC No.2182/2015} and Om Sai Traders & Tent House v. State of Chhattisgarh & others{WA No.38/2015}, it is argued that the respondents are obliged in law to make payment of the undisputed amount.

3. Considering the entire facts situation of the case and the previous orders of this Court, both the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction that in the event the petitioners prefer representation before the Collector, Raipur, for payment of the undisputed amount within a period of one month from

today, the said respondent shall consider and decide petitioners' representation for making payment of the undisputed amount by the concerned department at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of representation.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna