High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/22/2017disposed off

Shakuntala v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-01-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 22 of 2017 • Shakuntala W/o Kartikram, Aged About 40 Years Sarpanch, Village Panchayat Hasuwa, Police Station Gidhori, Tahsil Kasdol, Civil And Revenue District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Collector, Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Sub Divisional OfÏcer ( Revenue), Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Tahsildar, Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Kamal Kishore Sharma, S/o Late Motilal Sharma, R/o Village Hasuwa, Police Station Gidhori, Tahsil Kasdol, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. C.P. Lahrey, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. A.S. Kachhwaha, Addl. Advocate General For Respondent No.6 Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate Hon'bel Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 11/1/2017

1. Heard.

2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against the interim order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division, dismissing the petitioner's prayer for grant of interim relief.

3. The petitioner has been held disqualified under Section 36 (1)(q) of the C.G. Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993, as she was found to have encroached and raised construction on Government land.

4. The Additional Commissioner has passed a reasoned order while deciding the petitioner's application for grant of interim relief, therefore, no case for interference is made out, however, the Additional Commissioner, Raipur, is directed to decide the pending Revision Application of the petitioner, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 03 months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

5. The writ petition stands accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna