← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1174/2018disposed off

Pramod Kumar Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1174 of 2018 Pramod Kumar Soni S/o Ramawatar Soni, aged about 30 years, Caste Sonar, Dhanora, Post Dudhawa, Tahsil Narharpur, District Kanker (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Thana Naya Raipur, Tahsil and District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector and Officiating Deputy Secretary of State of Chhattisgarh, Collectorate District of Raigarh, Thana Tahsil & District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub- Divisional Officer, (Revenue- Cum- Land Acquisition Officer), Raigarh Tahsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Tahsildar, Tahsil of Pusore, Office of Tahsildar, Thana Pusore, Tahsil Pusore District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

5. General Manager, National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, Talaipali (Coal Mining Project Railway Line) Thana Gharghoda, Tahsil and District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

6. Vanshpati Singh S/o Chintamani Singh, aged about 45 years, R/o Bade Atarmuda, Tahsil Thana, and District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. N. K. Malviya, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. R. N. Pusty, G. A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 26/04/18 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make representation before the Collector

under Section 33 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (henceforth 'Act, 2013') for grant of compensation and rehabilitation and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

2.

Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and accordingly the same is allowed.

3.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make appropriate representation for grant of compensation & rehabilitation before the Collector. In the eventuality of filing such a representation, the Collector shall consider and dispose of the same expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after hearing the affected parties. 4.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka