← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/155/2015dismissed

Dhaneshwari Mahar v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-01-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

:/- ® IN THE^HON'BLE HIGH COUiiTJ?F CHHATTISGARH AT^ILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C)No.

15-S OF 2015 PETITIONER Dhaneshwari Mahar, Aged about 27years, ^ v'^f^5 W/o Dinesh Mahar, R/0 Village Revey Tehsil, Berla Distt- Bemetara (C.G) \JVERSUS ®s .^ fw's s?'' .^'

RESPONDENTS

1. State of Chattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Panchayat Departme^t, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur(C.G.).

The Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Revey, Tehsil Berla, Distt Bemetara (C.G.).

y.

The Collector, Distt- Bemetara, (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer, Saja, Distt- ^Bemetara, (C.G) ^"

» The Tehsildar/Returning officer, Janpad Berla, Distt-Bemetara (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W.P.faNo.155of2015 Dhaneshwari Mahar PETITIONER

Versus

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others W.P.raNo.156of2015 Asman Markam PETITIONER

Versus

f ^ iStaNof pHMaaiSgaEh & others And -'--K.?|!y ^ W.P.(C) No.159 of 2015 !|, j RESPONDENTS Dinesti Kaushal PETITIONER •:;..;fj.S:Versus''

RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bench : Hon'bleS<hnJustice Prashant Kumar Mishra Present:- Shri Rajesh Rpshan Singh, |Shri Anmol Sharma and Shri MK Bhaduri, Advdcates for the respective petitioners. Shri S. Rathore, Dy. (3i?EfQrthe State.

* ORALORDER (Passed on this 29th Day ofJanuary, 2015) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1.

WP (C) No.155/2015 and WP (C) No.159/2015 have been preferred by the wife and husband respectively, challenging the order passed by the Returning Officer rejecting their nomination for contesting the election for the office of Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Reve, district Bemetara. 2.

WP (C) No.156/2015 has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the rejection of his nomination paper for contesting election for the office of Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Lubha, District Kondagaon.

..-<-^-/'

a/ After hearing learned counsel for the respective petitioners at length, in view of the bar contained underArticle 243-0 of the Constitution of India, the present writ petitions are found not maintainable. In view of the above, all the writ petitions are dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioners, if they so desire, may prefer election petition under Section of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993.

Sd.'/- Prashant Kumar Judge ASHU