Dinesh Kumar Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4400 of 2013 • Dinesh Kumar Dubey S/o Late B.R. Dubey Aged About 56 Years Working As Sr. Agriculure Development OfÏcer O/o Assistant Soil Survey OfÏcer Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, Raipur C.G.

2. Director O/o Directorate Department Of Agriculture, Raipur C.G.

3. Assistant Soil Survey OfÏcer Bilaspur O/o Assistant Soil Survey OfÏcer Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G.

4. Sahkari Dhugdh Utpadak Sangh Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Sahkari Dhugdh Utpadak Sangh Limited, Urla, Post B.M.Y. Charoda, Distt. Durg C.G.

---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Majid Ali, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board By 25/08/2015 Heard.

(2) In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has called in question the order dated 12.12.2013 (Annexure P/1), whereby, the Director, Agriculture, has repatriated the petitioner to his parent department i.e. Sahkari Dhugdh Utpadak Sangh Limited, Urla , Post B.M.Y. Charoda District Durg (C.G.). The petitioner has also

prayed for grant of revised pay scale and benefit of Kramonnati together with arrears of salary.

(3) Mr. Thakur, learned counsel for respondent No.4 would submit that the petitioner has already joined in the ofÏce of respondent No.4 at Urla, therefore, challenge to Annexure P/1 has been rendered infructuous. For other reliefs, he would submit that the matter shall be examined and necessary order shall be passed in accordance with law. (4) In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that respondent No.4 shall consider the issue of petitioner's entitlement to revised pay scale and Kramonnati and pass speaking order at the earliest preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order before the competent authority. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Gowri