← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRA/580/2021withdrawn

Amit Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh,

2021-06-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRA No. 580 of 2021 • Amit Gupta, S/o Shri Ramjas Gupta, aged about 31 Years, R/o B.C.M. Colliery Khongapani, Police Station Jhagrakhand, District Korea Chhattisgarh. Present Address - Police Chowki, Ramgarh, Thana Sonhat, District - Korea Chhattisgarh.

----Appellant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Station House Officer, Police Station Ajak Sonhat, District Korea Chhattisgarh. (Ajak Sonhat is Mentioned in the Covering page of evidence recorded by Special Court (Annexure A -2), District : Koriya, (Baikunthpur). ----Respondent For Applicant Shri R.K. Gupta, Advocate.

For State Shri Adil Minhaj, Government Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya Order on Board 14/06/2021

1. The matter is heard through Video Conferencing.

2. This appeal by the accused/appellant under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is directed against the order dated 18.02.2020 passed by the Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Koria, Baikunthpur, C.G., refusing to allow his regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The appellant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.18/2020 for the offence punishable under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code, under Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and under Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and registered at Police Station AJAK Sonhat, District Koria, C.G.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not want to prosecute this appeal and seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate Bench. However, he prays for return of certified copy of the impugned order.

4. Permission granted.

5. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the counsel for the appellant on his furnishing true authenticated Xerox of the same.

Sd/- Gautam Chourdiya Judge Akhilesh