Kamta Nath Chaudhary v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

®

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

?

WRIT PETITION (s) No.

PETITIONER KamTa NaTh Chaudhary S/o.

Shri 43 year's, R/o. Villge KodaTar'ai, P.S.

w)?

"

Bhupdevpur,' DisTricT Raigar-h, Civil Shyamji Lal Chaudhar'y, aged abou'r '

"(5'\ $aoow;3\\c> and Revenue DisTricT Raigar'h (CG) ......

Versus

. .

#'yf'

N REsPONDENTs 1.

sme of Chhamsgarh, through the SecreTary, Scheduled CasTe and Scheduled Tribe Development Man'rmlaya, Police STaTion Rakhi, Tahsil Aar-ang, Naya Ralpur, DisTr-ic'r Raipur (CG) 2.

Commissioner, DeparTmenT of Scheduled CasTe and Scheduled Tribe, P.S.

Raipur, DisTricT Raipur (CG) i 3.

AssisTanT Commissioner, Tribal a e x-wwa'

Welfare DeparTmenT, Raigarh, P.$.

Raigarh, DisTricT Raigarh (CG) 4.

Block EducaTion 'Officer, Block Gharghoda, P.S. Gharghoda, DisTricT Raigarh (C6) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

9'} mam wm, may "é" em wt mm (W) WumaW f§ém1 m%m %a?mar&m \ m$ SB : Hon'ble Shri Prasha_nLKumar Mishra, J.

'

1-1-2014 Heard Ms. Indira Trip thi, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Rakesh Jha, Govt. Advocat for the State.

At the very outset, Iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit tha the petitioner does not press any other relief(s) and confine his pr yer to the extent that the respondents may be directed to scr inize the case of the petitioner in accordance with the instruc ions issued vide memo dated 7-3-2012. 'Learned counsel app aring for the State would submit that the case of the petitioner w ll be scrutinized in accordance with the prevailing memo dated 7-3 012 and if he is found fit, appropriate order thereof for his contnuation of service will be passed in accordance with law.

ln view of the above ubmission made by the learned State counsel, according to the le rned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in t is writ petition.

'

Accordingly, the writ p tition is disposed of.