High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1274/2016infructuous

Dayal Hari Das v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-09-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1274 of 2016 • Dayal Hari Das S/o. Shri Khagendra Das, aged about 50 years, S.A.S. Presently Working at Sub Treasury Office, Antagarh, Post and Thana Antagarh, District North Baster, Kanker, C.G.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Treasury, Account and Pension Department, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Ku. Kavita Chicholkar, Posted at Sub Treasury Office, Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

4. Shri Jagdish Prasad Jaiswal, Posted at District Treasury Office, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. Shri Anil Kumar Bari, Posted at District Treasury Office, Ambikapur, District Ambikapur- Sarguja Chhattisgarh.

6. Shri. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Posted at Treasury Training School, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur

Chhattisgarh.

7. Shri. Anil Kumar Sinha, Posted at Sub Treasury Bagicha, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

8. Shri. Kishor Kumar Tamrakar, Posted at Sub Treasury, Janakpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

9. Shri. Subeer Bhattacharya, Posted at State Election Commission, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

10.Shri. Madhukar Kashyap, Posted at District Treasury Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

11.Shri. Satish Kumar Mansagar, Posted at Indrawati Treasury Office, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

12.Shri. Nagendra Singh Thakur, Posted at Indrawati Treasury Office, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 & 2 :- Mr. Soumya Rai, PL.

For Respondents No.5 to 8 & 13 :- Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

01/09/2021

1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken up through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time and no cause of action survives for consideration.

3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

4. Before parting with record, this Court appreciates the endeavour of Mr. Somkant Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, in ensuring disposal of old cases and the same is placed on record.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit