← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1314/2020disposed off

Smt. Padama Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1314 of 2020 Smt. Padama Gupta W/o Late Phagu Sah Aged About 55 Years Secretary Of Adarsh Prahari Women Self Help Group Village- Khajuri, P.S. And Tahsil- Balrampur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village- Khajuri Post- Baskepi P.S. And Tahsil- Balrampur, DistrictBalrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Colletor Balrampur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Distict Program Officer Women And Child Development Balrampur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Project Officer Integrated Child Development Project- Balrampur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

5. Ma Mahila Self Help Group Semertola Through The Secretary Ma Mahila Self Help Group Semertola Block- Balrampur, District- BalrampurRamanujganj, Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate For State/Res. No.1 to 4 :

Ms. Sunita Jain, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 30/06/2020

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the Annexure P-1 dated 20.05.2020. Vide the said order of supply of ready to eat foods

of Anganwadi Centre Sector Maharajganj, District Balrampur has been cancelled.

2. This Court is of the opinion that since there is a provision of appeal to the Collector against the cancellation of such allotment orders, the petition itself would not be sustainable.

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that even as on date the petitioner is supplying ready to eat food to the Anganwadi Centres and the impugned order has not been given effect to.

4. Subject to the verification, if what the petitioner states is correct, let petitioner prefer an appeal before the appropriate authority within a period of seven days and for these seven days enabling the petitioner to prefer appeal, let status quo as it exists today be maintained.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit