← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3130/2017disposed off

Usha Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (C) No.

3 13

1. Usha Bai, Wd/o. Late Mohan Ram Shrivas, aged about 40 years.

2. Baldau Shrivas, S/o. Late Kaliram Shrivas, aged about 39 years. Both are R/o. Village Bisanpura, Police Station Pipariya, Tehsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revneue and Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. Collector, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

3. Deputy Collector, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.)

4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kawardha, Distict Kabirdham (C.G.)

5. Tehsildar, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 2 3 / 11 /201 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner's No. 2 application claiming compensation on account of death of his mother due to natural calamity has been rejected by the Collector by its order dated 24.04.2017 whereas he is entitled for compensation in accordance with clause 4 of part 6 of the Revenue Book Circular and, therefore, he may be allowed to make representation to the

Commissioner, Durg Division against the order of Collector and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 2.

Prayer appears to be fair & reasonable and accordingly the same is allowed.

3.

Be that as it may, if the petitioner prefers representation before the Commissioner, Durg Division against the order dated 24.4.2017 passed by the Collector within a period of ten days from today, the Commissioner, Revenue Revision shall consider and decide the same within a period for 45 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law after hearing the affected parties. 4.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-