← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/1790/2006dismissed

Bundru Ram v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2017-10-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

Sa«w8- "'-°• e ,&.^i"

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

(CGI WRIT PETITION N0. [15 °/2006 PETITIONER Bundru Ram, aged about 52 years son of Shri Ram Lal Gabel, occupation - agriculturist, resident ofvillage Aman-dula, P.S. and Tah.

vfc-;-^y/'

>0^./"^w'

..-• f^^ Malkharauda, Distt.

JanjgirChampa(C.G.) . ^•'li''?^-'1'

v-yy ^•••""

VERSUS

-'.-i .0 RESPONDENTS <^^r-- /^'

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through - / Secretary, Department of Revenue Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) , 2.

The Collector, Distt.

JanjgirChampa (C.G.) / 3.

Land Acquisition Officer, Hasdeo Bango Project, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WPNo.1790 of 2006 Bundru Ram, aged about 52 years, son of Shri Ram Lal Gabel, occupation - agriculturist, resident of village Aman-dula, P.S. and Tah. Malkharauda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) -- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Revenue, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.)

2. The Collector, Distt. Janj'gir-Champa (C.G.) 3.

Land Aequisition Officer, Hasdeo Bango Project, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa -- Respondents For Petitioners For State None.

Mr. Aditya Sharma, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Saniav K. Aarawal Order On Board 12/10/2017 (1) Even affer the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for the petitioner, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.

Sd4.

swz^ (2) Accordingly.the writ petition is dismissed fonwant of prosecution.