Ramkhilawan v. Ramesh Kumar Dewangan

€€By ^^•^>1"

^y>> .^- ^'

i^ ^'.h..-- ABV'"

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR

First Appeal No. l^- of 2006 Appellant <Defendant «-'', JRam Khilawan S/o Shri Baiju Lodhi, Aged about 50 years R/o village Kanhardabari, Tahsil - Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG)

Versus

Respondent Plaintiff ^ Ramesh Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Radhunandan Dewangan, Aged about 22 years, R/o Village Sukuldaihan, P.S. Lalbag, Tahsil & Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF Tt-fE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE %^£TZ»

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR FIRST APPEAL No. 162 of 2006 RAMKHILAWAN - Appellant

Versus

RAMESH KUMAR DEWANGAN - Respondent For Appellant. g% ;', :

For RespondetSt 't''To.°;.;E:

No one appears for the appellant.

Mr. V.K.Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja Order On Board^ 21/01/2015 By this appeal, the appellant challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 11.05.2006 passed by 1st Additional District Judge, Rajnandgaon m Civil SuitNo.ll-A/2004 dismissing the plaintifFs suit for specific perfbrmance of contract.

Since no one appears for the appellant when the matter is called for hearing even in second round, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want ofprosecution.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want ofprosecution. No order as to costs.

• Sd/- Inder Singh Uboweja Judge Anjani