High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/4760/2006disposed off

Smt.Umeshwari v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2017-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.4760 of 2006 Smt. Umeshwari W/o Shri Har Narayan, aged about 32 years, by caste Rajput, occupation House wife, resident of Village Charpara, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Women and Child Development Department, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG)

2. The Deputy Director (Estt), Women and Child Development, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (CG)

3. The Collector, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (CG)

4. The Additional Collector, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (CG)

5. Project Officer, Woman and Child Development, Project Baloda, District Janjgir Champa (CG)

6. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baloda, District Janjgir Champa (CG)

7. Gram Panchayat Charpara, through Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Charpara, District Janjgir Champa (CG)

8. Smt.Anjani Bai W/o Ramesh Kumar, resident of Village Charpara, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr.Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents No.1 to 5 :

Mr.Ashish Surana, P.L.

For Respondent No.8 :

Mr.K. Kushwaha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 29/11/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was entitled to be appointed as Anganwadi Sahayika, Charpara Centre 1, but her candidature has been rejected and respondent No.8 has been appointed by order dated 14.7.2006. He would further submit that father of respondent No.8 is government servant and she is not deserted woman, therefore, she is not entitled for preference as shown in the circular issued by the competent authority.

2. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.8 would submit that respondent No.8 is deserted woman and she has rightly been given preference.

3. Since disputed question of fact is involved in the present writ petition, the Collector, Janjgir-Champa is directed to hear both the parties and take a decision within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Parties are directed to remain present before the Collector, Janjgir-Champa on 19.12.2017.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. No cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-