Gautam Prasad Das v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION(S) No. § L93 OF 2006 PETITIONER Gautam Pra§ad Das Aged about 53 Years / S/o Late Shn P.P'Das Occupation: Service Presently working as Additional Superintending Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Eiectricity Board, R/o Qtr. No, N.C. 6, CSEB New Coiony, Tifra, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh k.
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
1. State of Chhattisgarh / Through Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Energy Mantraiaya, DKS Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh /
2. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Through its Secretary l i CSEB Headquarters Danganiya, Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Chairman ~/ V '
é Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Danganiya, Raipur ll 4, Superintending Engineer (O&M) Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board x Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5. Shri A.P.Namdeo, / Secretary (Retired) Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Through Secretary, CSEB Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
6. Shri G.L.Patel w Superintending Engineer (0&M) Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
7. Shri A.R.Choudhary / Retired Superintending'Engineer (STRE) Construction Circle, CSEB Bilaspur, Through Secretary, CSEB Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
8. Shri A.N.Agrawal -'
Additional Chief Engineer (Retired) Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board R/o HIG (R) B-26, Parijat Extension Colony Ring Road Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
@ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OR WRITS
IN THE NATURE OF
DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS
ORDER
OR ORDERS, CERTIORA MANDAMUS OR THE LIKE RIL
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.51 93 of 2006 c Gautam Prasad Das ---- Petitioner ,, _,
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh and others --~- Respondent K \,\ , For Petitioner Mr. R.S.Marhas, Advocates For State Mr. ShashankThakur, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 16/11/2016 '1.
Learned counsel For the petitioner wouid plead no instructions in the JV matter.
2.
No other counsel is appearing on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
3.
In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option except to '
dismiss this petition forwant of prosecution. » i Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra l Judge l Shyna