High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5272/2017disposed off

Yogendra Kumar Janghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5272 of 2017

1. Yogendra Kumar Janghel S/o Shri Paladuram Janghel, Aged About 33 Years, Presently Posted And Working As The Constable No. 448 CAF, 11th Battalion Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhagttisgarh.

2. Shailendra Kumar Pandey, S/o Late Harishankar Pandey, Aged About 37 Years, Presently Posted And Working As The Constable No. 093 CAF, 6th Battalion Raighrh, District Rairgarh Champa Chhagttisgarh. District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Home Police Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh

2. Director General Of Police, Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarters, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Additional Director General Of Police, CAF, Police Head Quarters Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Commandant, 11th Batalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Force District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Dilman Rathi Minj, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 15/02/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that petitioner's case for absorption on the post of Constable (Armourer) has not been considered by the respondent authorities, though the petitioner possesses the requisite qualification, against which the petitioner has also preferred representations before the respondent authorities but is pending

consideration since 09.08.2017 and has not been decided till date. 2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make additional representation before the competent authority for absorption on the post of Armourer and, in turn, the competent authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka