Heeradhar Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

^ ^^r

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH

AT BILASPUR W.P. (C) No. '7r77/2013 PETITIONER :

Heeradhar Patel son of late Kumund Ram Patel, aged about 47 years, R/o.

Village Charbhata, Post Dongitarai, .-,-i_T-| 1 ^....-.- P.S.

Bhupdeopur, Tahsil Raigarh, .•T--'%"5'"'fc-<:^3.c^ „. ..

/„ - „. _ . ^7 ^N°"^"h'y-Sn*"^:''""!^"^- ^lvl'

an<^ Revenue District Raigarh 'D^ed....---^"fi't T (C-G->-

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS :1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Departnient of Industries, Government of Chhattisgarh Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Civil and Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 3.

Sub Divisional Officer, Raigarh, J> District-Raigarh (C.G.) 4.

M/s Visa Power Limited, Through its General Manager (Coal Based Thermal Power Plant) Village : Dumarpali, Devri, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Petitioners above named respectfully begs to submit as under:- '^ '

1., PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER :

'A •av"^^ ^?

HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W.P.^No.777of2013 Heeradhar Patel PETITIONER

Versus

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Present:- Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. ShriA. Surana, Dy. GAfortheState.

Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. ,.:«"£I'a fc-;

ORALORDER .-•:.;:

(Passed on this 20th Day of February, 2015) l-1eardlearned counsel forthe parties.

The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking a direction to 1.

respondent No.2 to determine compensation since 2011 and further direction to respondent N0.4 to make proper arrangement for water outlet in future.

Shri Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 would submit that water outlet has already been constructed. For other reliefs, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available in law including filing a representation before the competent authority.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

- - Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge