← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhSA/134/2006non prosecution

Sudhar Ram And Another v. Gendi Bai And Others

2019-02-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR SA No. 134 of 2006

1. Sudhar Ram, S/o Budhram, aged about 24 years.

2. Guruwari Bai, Wd/o budhram, aged about 60 years. Both are Kawar by caste, resident of village Kodwaripara Dharamjaygarh, Tahsil Dharamjaygarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Appellants

Versus

1. A) Gendi Bai, aged about 65 years, W/o Sadhram, Resident of Dharamjaygarh, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) B) Tara Bai, W/o Paimasi Ram, aged 45 years, resident of Dharamjaygarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) C) Chandi Bai, W/o Ude Ram, aged 31 years resident of Pusalda, Tahsil Dharamjaygarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) D) Chandro Bai, W/o Samarat, aged 31 years resident of village Budhadand, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G.) E) Kanti Lal, aged about 42 years, resident of village Dharamjaygarh, Tahsil Dharamjaygarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) F) Bhaktu Ram, aged 38 years, resident of Dharamjaygarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) No. 1(A) Widow of Sadhram and rest are daughter and son of Late Sadh Ram, Resident of Dharamjaygarh, Tahsil Dharamjaygarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

2. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) --- Respondents For Appellants :

None.

For Respondent No. 2 :

Mr. R. K. Jaiswal, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 06.02.2019 1.

Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for the appellants, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.

2.

Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/ -