High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/712/2015dismissed

Smriti Grih Nirmana Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. Bikri Adhikari Sales Officer Bhilai Nagrik Sahakari Bank Maryadit

2015-08-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 712 of 2015 • Smriti Grih Nirmana Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit , Smriti Nagar Bhilai Police Station- Supela Tehshil & Civil & Revenue District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, Through- Rajiv Choubey, President ---- Applicant / Respondent No. 1

Versus

1. Bikri Adhikari (Sales Officer) Bhilai Nagrik Sahakari Bank Maryadit Sector- 6 Bhilai, P. S. Kotwali- Bhilai Tehshil & Civil & Revenue District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.

Non-Applicant No.1/Petitioner

2. State of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Co-Operatives Through Secretary, Department Of Co-Operatives Mantralaya. New Raipur, Police StationNew Raipur Tehshil & Civil & Revenue District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Registrar, Co-Operatives Societies Chhattisgarh Raipur, Police Station- New Raipur Tehshil & Civil & Revenue District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Joint Registrar, Co-Operatives Societies Chhattisgarh Raipur, Police Station- New Raipur Tehshil & Civil & Revenue District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Deputy Registrar, Co-Operatives Societies Chhattisgarh Raipur, Police Station- New Raipur Tehshil & Civil & Revenue District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Smt. Balvinder Kour Dhillon W/o Shri Trilok Singh Dhillon Aged About 47 Years R/o 7 - A / 1 Nehru Nagar East, Bhilai Police Station- Supela Tehshil & Civil & Revenue District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicants/Respondents For Applicant :

Shri Pradeep Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 27/08/2015

1. By this application, the applicant/respondent No.1 in WPC No.1711/2013 has prayed for extension of time for deciding the suit for further period of six

months.

2. On going through the record and the papers annexed with the MCC, it is manifest that no case has been made out by the applicant by giving sufficient and cogent reasons for extension of time.

3. In view of the above, the MCC is dismissed. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu