← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1201/2018disposed off

Basant Ram Dahariya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-05-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(C) No. 1201 of 2018 • Basant Ram Dahariya S/o Farheram Dahariya, Aged about 40 years, R/o Village - Sankri, Post - G.S.I., Police Station Vidhan Sabha, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.)

2. Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

4. Tahsildar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

5. Revenue Inspector, Raipur, Tahsil 09, District - Raipur (C.G.)

6. Nayab Tahsildar, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.)

7. Patwari, Patwari Halka No.75/41, Village Sankri, Tahsil and District - Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Paranjpe & Prasoon Agrawal, Advocates.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 17/05/18 1.

Learned State counsel submits that the affidavit of the Collector has been filed. Para 7 of the affidavit so filed states as under: "Further, it is submitted that in disputed cases, a Committee / Team is formed consisting of one or more Patwari & one or

more Revenue Inspectors or as the case may be for the prompt disposal of applications pending for demarcation. It is pertinent to mention here that, in the previous Revenue Year i.e. 01-10-2016 to 30-09-2017, Revenue Authorities have disposed of about 3716 applications of demarcation in District Raipur. Therefore, the deponent herein submits, this year too within a period of one year, all the aforesaid applications i.e. 1,913 will also be disposed of if the applicants cooperate and the said time period of is granted to the revenue authorities." 2.

The Principal Secretary (Revenue) has also filed an affidavit in similar lines.

3.

The affidavits of Secretary (Revenue) and the Collector are taken on record. The writ petition stands finally disposed of with a hope that they will abide by the affidavits submitted before this Court. No costs. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Kvr