Sangeeta Suryavanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2716 of 2017 Sangeeta Suryavanshi D/o Shri Shushil Kumar, Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Pandripar, Post Ghutku, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat Department, Mantrayala, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, District Panchyat Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

3. Ashwani, D/o Leela Ram, R/o Satnami Para, Village And Post Belgahna, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur

4. Smt. Saroj W/o Amar Singh Premi, R/o Village Jhumarpali, Post Bhatgaon, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Yogesh Chandra, Advocate For Respondent / State :

Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 28/06/2017 Though the petitioner has raised several grounds to assail action of the respondent / Jila Panchayat in appointing respondents 3 and 4 and claiming appointment for herself on the submission that the petitioner, having been selected, was entitled to be appointed, in view of existence of alternative and efficacious statutory remedy of appeal under Panchayat (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995, I am not inclined to examine the case on merits. At this stage, this petition is dismissed with liberty to file appeal before the appellate authority against the orders, action and inaction of respondent No.2. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti