High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1920/2015dismissed

Manohar Jethani v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-10-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1920 of 2015 • Manohar Jethani S/o Late Dr. Varialdas Jethani, Aged About 45 Years R/o Beside Kohinoor Hotel, Amardeep Talkies Road, BansTal, Raipur, P.O. Raipur Main, P.S. Gol Bazar, Tahsil Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin 492001, Presently Residing At Ward No. 36, Shikshak Colony, New Kursipar Bhilai, P.O. New Khursipar- Bhilai, P.S. New Kursipar, Civil & Revenue District Durg, Chhattisgarh, Pin 490011 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Town Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, New Secretariat, Mahanadi Gate, Raipur, P.O. Raipur Main, P.S. Mana, Tahsil Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur, Chhattsigarh, Pin 492001

2. The Municipal Corporation, Through Commissioner, BhilaiSupela, P.O. Supela- Bhilai, P.S. Supela- Bhilai, Tahsil Durg, Civil & Revenue District Durg, Chhattisgarh, Pin 490023 ---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate For respondent No.2 Mr. H.B. Agarwal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 29/10/2015 Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. (2) The petitioner's earlier writ petition i.e. WP(C) No.3334 of 2009 on the same issue was dismissed by this Court in vide order dated 28.02.2012, which was afÏrmed by the Division Bench in Writ Appeal

No.279 of 2012. The second writ petition i.e. WP(C) No.995 of 2014 preferred by the petitioner was dismissed on 03.03.2015, against which, the writ appeal preferred by the petitioner bearing No.210/2015, was dismissed, as withdrawn. The said writ appeal was sought to be withdrawn for pursuing departmental remedies however, the Division Bench made no observation with regard to the same. (3) In the above view of the matter, no case for entertaining the writ petition is made out. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna