High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1094/2016infructuous

Josh Philip v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-09-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1094 of 2016 • Josh Philip S/o Late Philip Joseph, Aged About 55 Years R/o Qr. No. H.I.G.-01, Housing Board Coloney (Bodhghat), Ward No. 32, Thana-Bodhghat, Post-Jagdalpur, District-Baster At Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Treasury, Account and Pension Department, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Ku. Kavita Chicholkar, Posted At Sub Treasury Office, Saraipali, DistrictMahasamund Chhattisgarh.

4. Shri Jagdish Prasad Jaiswal, Posted At District Treasury Office, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. Shri Anil Kumar Bari, Posted At District Treasury Office, Ambikapur, DistrictAmbikapur-Sarguja Chhattisgarh.

6. Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey, Posted At Treasury Training School, Bilaspur, District-

Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

7. Shri Anil Kumar Sinha, Posted At SubTreasury Bagicha, District-Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

8. Shri Kishor Kumar Tamrakar, Posted At SubTreasury, Janakpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

9. Shri Subeer Bhattacharya, Posted At State Election Commission, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

10.Shri Madhukar Kashyap, Posted At District Treasury Raigarh, District-Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

11.Shri Satish Kumar Mansagar, Posted At Indrawati Treasury Office, New Raipur, District-Raipur Chhattisgarh.

12.Shri Nagendra Singh Thakur, Posted At Indrawati Treasury Office, New Raipur, District-Raipur Chhattisgarh.

13. Shri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, Posted At District Treasury Balodabazar, DistrictBalodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 & 2 :- Mr. Soumya Rai, PL.

For Respondents No.5 to 8 & 13 :- Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 01/09/2021

1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken up through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time and no cause of action survives for consideration.

3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

4. Before parting with record, this Court appreciates the endeavour of Mr. Somkant Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, in ensuring disposal of old cases and the same is placed on record.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit