Mahendra Singh Marawi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.4592 of 2015 Mahendra Singh Marawi, son of Shri Hriday Singh Marawi, aged about 28 years, residence of Deendayal Colony, Nikhil Ashram, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur (CG) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG).

2.

Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, District Korba (CG) 3.

District Education Officer, Korba, District Korba (CG) 4.

Block Education Officer, Block Kartala, District Korba (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri C.Jayant K. Rao, Advocate.

For Respondent : Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 03/12/2015 (1) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.

(2) The present case pertains to the non-payment of retiral dues in particular G.P.F. to the petitioner.

(3) Learned counsel for the State submits that the State Government has already constituted a High Power Retiral Dues

Committee and the said Committee is duly empowered to consider the case like that of the petitioner. (4) Let the petitioner file a representation to the said Committee or to make a request to the office of the Advocate General along with copy of the writ petition for forwarding the same to the Committee. Let this be done within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

(5) On this being done, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

(6) With the above observations, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-