High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4239/2016disposed off

Smt. Pramila Dhruv v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.4239 of 2016

1. Smt. Pramila Dhruv D/o Samelal, Aged About 41 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), posted At Govt. Primary School Kuwarimud, P.S. Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Bharat Lal Kaiwartya, S/o Debiram Kaiwartya, Aged About 42 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) Posted At Govt. Primary School Melnadih, P.S. Ratanpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Anuradha Singh, W/o Shri Neeraj Singh Rajput, Aged About 42 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) Posted At Govt. Primary School Dindol, P.S. Ratanpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development, Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Ditrict Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Public Education Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Director, State Council Of Educational Research And Training, Chhattisgarh, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

6. Block Education Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr.Govind Ram Miri, Advocate For Res.No.1, 2 and 6 :

Ms Sunita Jain, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 23/1/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are working as Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) since 1998-99, but they are not being allowed to undergo B.Ed./D.Ed. Training for which they have made representation, which has not been considered and decided till this date.

2. Be that as it may, respondent No.5 is directed to consider and disposed off the petitioners' representation which has been made for redressal of their grievances within six weeks from the date of presentation of a copy of this order. The petitioners are at liberty to make an additional representation, if any.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed off. No cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-