Naresh Verma (Basone) & Another v. State Of Chhattisgarh
MCRC No. 4055 of 2021 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Proceeding through video conferencing MCRC No. 4055 of 2021
1. Naresh Verma (Basone) S/o Dulichand Verma Aged About 34 Years Caste Lodhi, Resident of Village Parsuli, Tahsil Lanji, District Balaghat Madhya Pradesh.
2. Mukesh Verma (Dhamane) S/o Tikaram Verma Aged About 40 Years Caste Lodhi, Resident of Village Chowki Tola, Bortalav, Tahsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicants
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Bortalav, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Applicants - Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate.
For Respondent/State - Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Dy. Advcocate General Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Ag. Chief Justice Order on Board 05-08-2021
1. Heard.
2. The applicants have preferred the first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., as they are arrested in connection with Crime No.08/2021, registered at Police Station - Bortalav, DistrictRajnandgaon (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 294, 323, 324, 506, 452, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25, 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The applicant No.1 Naresh Verma is son-in-law, whereas the applicant No.2 Mukesh Verma is Bhanja of injured Yograj Lodhi. At about 5 p.m. on 15-02-2021, applicants entered the house of the injured and after
MCRC No. 4055 of 2021 raising a dispute about partition of land, filthily abused and assaulted him by means of sharp edged weapon.
4. As per the statement of the injured, the injury has been caused by applicant No.1 Naresh Verma and further that previously also, Naresh Verma had raised quarrel and assaulted him but being his son-in-law, he did not lodge the report.
5. Learned State counsel would oppose the prayer for grant of bail.
6. Considering the allegation against the applicant No.1 Naresh Verma, his bail application is dismissed reserving liberty in favour of the applicant to revive the prayer after examination of the injured.
7. As against the applicant No.2, Mukesh Verma, there is no allegation of causing injuries to injured Yograj Lodhi. He is in jail since 02-03-2021 and the charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, this Court is inclined to release the applicant No.2 Mukesh Verma on bail.
8. Accordingly, the bail application in respect of applicant No.2 Mukesh Verma is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the said Court.
SD/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Acting Chief Judge Amardeep