Rakesh Kumar Goswami v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF C.G. AT BILASPUR

WritADpeal No.

S.\ of 2015 fD.B.l Rakesh Kumar Goswami son of APPELLAN fPetitionerl Shri Shambhu Dayal Goswami, aged about year, R/o.

T-24, Avanti Vihar, Telibandha, Raipur, P.S.

Telibandha, Civil and Revenue District Raipur (C.G.), ^^ -.s.'

i>e-•»<* <s«",-^^""

VERSUS

State of Chhattisgarh, RESPONDENTS Through :

Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.) Under Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.), ^??^ Coordinator and Secretary, State Level Committee, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.), Special Secretary, Commercial Tax (Excise) Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)/ The Excise Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, Excise Building, Near

Chhokra Nala, Raipur, District Raipur (C.

WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 SUB-SECTION f 11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURTS fAPPEAL TO DIVISION BENCtU ACT. 2006 Eiil Bi HS

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR D.B.:

HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE SHRI P. SAM KOSHY,_J.

WRITAPPEAL N0. 21 OF 2015 Rakesh Kumar Goswami APPELLANT 1/ersus RESPaNDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others (WRIT APREAl3BN©ERSECTION 2(1) OR tHE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH}ACT, 2006) Appearance:

Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate forAppellant. Mr. R.K. Gupta, Dy. Advocate General forthe State.

ORDER

(1&th ofFetoruary, 2015) PER NAVIN SINHA.ACTINGCJ.

1.

After some arguments;learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal for pursuing the matter departmentally. 2.

We express no opinion on that aspect of the matter. 3.

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Anu

Chhokra Nala, Raipur, District Raipur (C.

WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 SUB-SECTION f 11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURTS fAPPEAL TO DIVISION BENCtU ACT. 2006 Eiil Bi HS