Smt. Pramila Barman v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3751 of 2017 Smt. Pramila Barman W/o Ram Khilawan Barman, Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted And Working As Supervisor, Integrated Child Development Project, Barpali, District Korba (Chhattisgarh).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur District : Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Under Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur District : Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Commissioner, Women And Child Development Department, Indravati Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur District : Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Collector, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

5. District Program Officer, Women And Child Development Department, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

6. Smt. Chandraprabha Sharma, Supervisor, Integrated Child Development Project, Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Manish Nigam, Panel Lawyer for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 16/08/2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has remained posted continuously in scheduled area for the last 7 years, by impugned order, she has again been transferred to another scheduled area. He submits that in such case, there is a policy of the State Government to consider posting outside the scheduled area under clause 2.1 of circular dated 03.06.2015.

2.

It is found that the petitioner has approached this Court without preferring any representation in that regard. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the transfer order. It will, however, be open for the petitioner to prefer representation before the competent authority to claim posting outside the scheduled area according to the Government Policy within a period of three weeks from today. If such representation is made, the competent authority shall take a decision on the representation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with copy of this order. For a period of four weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner, provided nobody has joined at the place of the petitioner.

3.

With the aforesaid observations, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti