← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4293/2017disposed off

Smt. Jaya Tiwari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-09-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4293 of 2017 Smt. Jaya Tiwari W/o Shri R. P. Tiwari, Aged About 50 Years Working As Principal, At Govt. Higher Secondary School Khamariya ( Junwani ) Bhilai, Block Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Durg Chhattisgarh

4. R. P. Gupta, Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary Sankara, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 07/09/2017 Heard.

1.

The transfer order is under challenge on the following grounds : (a) that the transfer order has been passed only to accommodate respondent No.4.

(b) that the petitioner's husband is posted as Veterinary College at Anjora and the petitioner has been transferred to a place which is at considerable distance from the place of posting of petitioner's husband. 2.

Admittedly, the petitioner has remained posted at the present place since last seven years. Therefore, she has become due for transfer. Once the

petitioner has completed normal tenure of posting at the present place, she has become due for transfer, posting of any other person in place of the petitioner, on his own request, without anything more, would not amount to malafide accommodation. Therefore, this ground is not made out to interfere with the transfer order.

3.

The petitioner has been transferred to a place which is only 40 km. away. The petitioner's husband is not posted at the same place. This matter, at best, could be considered only by the respondent authority whether the petitioner should be posted in any other station keeping in view the policy of the Government to keep husband wife together either at the same station or at nearby station as far as possible subject to administrative exigency and public interest.

4.

With the liberty to prefer representation on the second aspect only, the petition is disposed off. If the petitioner prefers representation, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha