← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6449/2017disposed off

Panchram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6449 of 2017 Panchram S/o Kunwar Singh Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Chanderi, Post Damakheda Tahsil Baloda Bazar District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Public Works Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralya Naya Raipur Civil & Revenue District Chhattisgarh.

2. Executive Engineer , National Highway No. 1 Public Works Department Raipur Pension Bada Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Joint Director, Department Of Treasure Account & Pension , Pension Bada Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub Divisional Officer , National Highway Sub Division 1 Public Works Department Kawardha District Kawardha Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents Shri Ashok Patil, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 27/11/2017 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the matter in issue is covered by the common order dated 26.2.2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals. Against the said order, the State travelled up to the Supreme Court by filing SLP (C) Nos.11541-11550/2016, which have been dismissed by the Supreme Court, affirming the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. They would pray that this writ petition may also be allowed in the same terms.

2. In view of the above joint statement made, the present writ petition is also allowed in terms of the common order dated 26.2.2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals. Let the current pension of the petitioner be calculated and payment commenced preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order and the arrears to be paid within a period of 12 months from the date current pension starts.

3. A copy of the order dated 26.2.2015 passed in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals, be made a part of this record. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti