Smt. Shashi Prabha Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3322 of 2019 Smt. Shashi Prabha Verma W/o Shri. Lalit Kumar Verma Aged About 40 Years Occupation - Asstt. Teacher (Lb) Government Primary School, Village Amera, Tahsil - Pallari District Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through, The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indravati Bhavan D - Block, 4th Floor, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Secretary, Department Of Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. The Director, Department Of Public Instruction, Pension, Bada, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

5. District Education Officer, District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

6. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Pallari, District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Azad Siddique, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ishan Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 03/05/2019 1.

The claim of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled for promotion from the post of Assistant Teacher (LB) to the post of Teacher (LB) since the petitioner fulfills all the requisite eligibility criteria required for promotion to the post of Teacher (LB).

2.

According to the petitioner, the department has not taken any steps for promotion. In case, for any reason, the department is not able to provide promotion to the petitioner, at least the petitioner's case be considered for grant of benefit of Kramonnati.

-23.

Given the nature of dispute that the petitioner has raised, let the petitioner make a suitable representation in this regard to the respondents No.4&5, who in turn, shall consider the merits of the representation which the petitioner makes and decide as to whether the petitioner is entitled for promotion. If not, at least the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati or not. 4.

Let the respondents No.4&5 take appropriate decision at the earliest preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved