High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1466/2020disposed off

Sonai Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-08-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1466 of 2020 Sonai Bai As A President, Anwala Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Bhaismudi, W/o Shri Sheetal, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Bhaismudi, Police Station And Tahsil Nawagarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector, Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh

5. The Project Officer, Integrated Women And Child Development Project Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh

6. The District Program Officer, Women And Child Development Project Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh

7. Rukhmani Bai Ex President, Anwala Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Bhaismudi, W/o Shri Sant Ram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Bhaismudi, Police Station And Tahsil Nawagarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board

10.08.2020

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 01.01.2020 passed by the respondent no.6 i.e. the District Programme Officer, Women and Child Development Project, Janjgir. Vide the said order, the District Programme Officer has cancelled the work order issued to the petitioner's society for supply of "ready to eat food".

2. The impugned order dated 01.01.2020 itself very specifically envisages that in the event if the petitioner is aggrieved of the said order, an appeal could be preferred to the District Collector within 30 days. It appears that the petitioner has not availed the said remedy and has straightway filed the present writ petition after more than 8 months period.

3. In view of the same, reserving the right of the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the District Collector along with an application for condonation of delay explaining the delay, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai