← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/4035/2020allowed

Raki @ Rakesh Bablani v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-10-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.No.4035 of 2020 Raki @ Rakesh Bablani S/o Mansukh @ Manoj, aged about 30 years, R/o Dabripara, Ravigram Telibandha, Police Station Telibandha, District Raipur (CG) ---Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, police of Police Station Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) ---Non-Applicant For Applicant :

Mr.Atanu Ghosh, Advocate For Non-applicant :

Mr.Ravi Bhagat, Dy.Govt.Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 19/10/2020 1.

Proceedings of this matter have been taken-up through video conferencing.

2.

The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for release him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.183/2020, registered at Police StationTelibandha, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG), for the offence punishable under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985. 3.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 3.100 kg. of ganja was recovered from possession of the present applicant and thereby committed the aforesaid offence.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in crime in question. He would further submit that the applicant has been arrested on 17.06.2020 and the trial is likely to take time for its conclusion, as such, the applicant is entitled to be released on regular bail.

5.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application.

6.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

7.

Taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of offence, pre-trial detention of the applicant and quantity of ganja, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

8.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.

9.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹ 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

10.

It is made clear that if the applicant has already been released on bail pursuant to the bail bonds already furnished in view of the order passed by the High Power Committee constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 23.3.2020 in the matter of In Re : Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in Prisons (Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No.1/2020), he need not furnish bail bonds afresh and the bail bonds already furnished shall be deemed to be the bail bonds furnished in compliance of the order of this Court, but if he has not furnished bail bonds earlier, then he will be required to furnish bail bonds.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-