Ganesh Ram Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3881 of 2016 • Ganesh Ram Dewangan S/o Late Dharam Singh, Dewangan, Aged About 73 Years Muthpara Ward No 3 Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administraiton, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Municipal Corporaiton Bhilai 3 Charoda District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. Government Advocate For Corporation :

Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 19/08/2016 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's claim that regular services rendered by the petitioner as regular employee of erstwhile Special Area Development Authority (for short "SADA") Bhilai, where he was initially appointed, are liable to be counted for the purposes of pensionable services. He submits that identical issue has been decided by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 in batch of petitions WP(S) No.4459 of 2014 and other cases.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute that the petitioner's claim of being identically placed as the petitioner, in whose favour, orders were passed in the case referred to above.

3.

In view of the above, this petition is also liable to be allowed and is allowed. Let the same benefit accrue to the petitioner as directed by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 in similar petition. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra