High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2133/2015disposed off

Mukesh Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-06-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2133 of 2015 • Mukesh Kumar Sahu aged about 40 years S/o Shri Chevaram Sahu, R/o Gram and Post Mokhali, Tahsil and District, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thorugh: Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Health Services, Pension Bada, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical & Health Officer, Rajnandgaon, District, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Medical & Health Officer, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

5. Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council, through: Its Registrar, Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council, D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri DK Wankhede, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Shri PK Bhaduri, PL for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 22/06/2015

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue raised in this petition is with regard to equivalence of qualification of the one year training course of Paramedics for appointment as MPHW.

2. Learned counsel for the parties would not dispute that Writ Appeal No. 530/2013 dealing with similar issue has been disposed of by the Division Bench on 30/10/2014 in the following manner :- "Without pressing the appeals on merits it is submitted now that the State Government has taken a policy decision with regard to equivalence of qualification of the one

year training course of Paramedics for appointment as MPHW and a clarificatory order has also been issued by the Health Department on 31.6.2013 in furtherance of Rules for appointment dated 6.7.2013, the only issue which remains for consideration is of retrospectivity for which the appellants desire to pursue the matter with the State Government. The appeals are disposed with that liberty. Any such representation filed is expected to be disposed expeditiously. Nothing in this order shall be deemed or construed as any opinion or observation on merits of the matter by us."

3. In view of above, the present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of Writ Appeal No.530/2013.

JUDGE ashu