Kamal Prasad Dadsena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPS No. 3672 of 2017

1. Kamal Prasad Dadsena S/o Shri Sukhiram Dadsena, Aged About 26 Years R/o Q No. M I GI I /28, Housing Board Khamtarai, Near D. L. S. College, Ashok Nagar, Sarakanda, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh- 495001, Chhattisgarh

2. Komal Gangwani, W/o Sumit Mewlani, Aged About 28 Years Near Dhan- Mandi, Torwa Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 495001

3. Vinod Kumar, S/o Santu Baghel Aged About 26 Years Villege- Sarwani, Post- Sarwani, TehsilBilha, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development , Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, P. S. Rakhi, P.O. Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh492002

2. Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Through Its Secretary, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector- 19, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002

3. Bilaspur Vishwavidyalaya, Through Its Registrar, Gandhi Chowk Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Collector Bilaspur Collectorate Compound Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Bilaspur, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 495001 ---- Respondents 24/02/2020 Shri Akash Kundu, counsel appears on behalf of Shri Kshitij Sharma, counsel for the petitioners.

Shri Neeraj Pradhan, PL for the State.

Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, counsel for respondent No.2. Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners pleads no instructions. Since no other counsel is appearing to press this writ petition nor any representation is made, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri ashu Judge