Radha Bai Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(Criminal) No. 265 of 2018 Radha Bai Yadav, W/o. Late Bharatlal Yadav, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Village Ganiyari, P.S. Kota, Tahsil Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

...........Complainant.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Inspector General Of Police, Police Department, New Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Collector, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For State/Respondents :

Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. G.A.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 04.05.2018 Heard 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a report was made by the petitioner that her daughter committed suicide by setting herself ablaze on 12.02.2018 and subsequently she succumbed to the injuries and before her death she clamped allegations on certain people and reasons have been attributed to them. Subsequently, the same having been reported to the Superintendent of Police on 09.02.2018 nothing has been transpired till date and no FIR has been registered. 2.

Perused the document Annexure P-2, which spells out that a cognizable offence has been committed, therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Ram Lal Narang v. State (Delhi Admn.) AIR 1979 SC 1791 and Lalita Kumari v.

Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others (2014) 2 SCC 1, since the cognizable offence has been committed, the concerned Police shall register the FIR and complete the investigation within a reasonable time. It is further observed that this Court has not observed anything on merit of this case attributing any allegation to anyone and the investigation officer shall be at liberty to exercise his jurisdiction and will on the basis of the evidence available to him.

3.

With such observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok