Smt. Shanti Bai Manikpuri v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2830 of 2015 • Smt. Shanti Bai Manikpuri W/o Shri Jaldas Manikpuri, Aged About 50 years Working As A Cook In Aswacha Dhandha Balak Ashram, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Residing In Aswacha Dhandha Balak Ashram, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, P.S. Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Police Station- Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare And Development, Police Station- Naya Raipur, District-Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. Collector, (Tribal Welfare And Development), Police Station-Civil Lines, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare And Development, Police StationCivil Lines, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents And WPS No. 2833 Of 2015 • Dilip Kumar Yadav S/o Late Shri Banshram Yadav, Aged About 46 years Working As A Cook, In Adarsha Kanya Shala, Deorikhurd, Bilaspur, R/o Village-Farhada, P.O.-Gatora, P.S.-Seepat, District-Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Police Station- Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare And Development, Police Station- Naya Raipur, District-Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. Collector, (Tribal Welfare And Development), Police Station-Civil Lines, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare And Development, Police StationCivil Lines, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Shri AK Swarnakar, Advocate For Respondent-State :
Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 06/08/2015
1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the issue involved in the present writ petitions have already been considered and decided by this Court in W.P.(S) No.2336/2010 {Jawaharlal Sahu & others Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others} and other connected matter, therefore, these writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of Jawaharlal Sahu (supra).
2. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Jawaharlal Sahu (supra).
3. A copy of the order passed in Jawaharlal Sahu (supra) be placed in the record of the present writ petitions.
Sd/- JUDGE Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu