High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2865/2015disposed off

Ramratan Mandle v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-08-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2865 of 2015 • Ramratan Mandle S/o Shri Mahttar Ram Mandle Aged About 51 years R/o Village- Khadma, Development Block - Chhura, Tahsil & P.S.- Chhura, District- Gariaband (Chhattisarh), Civil District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, And District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. Director, Lok Shikhan Sanchnalaya, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, And District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector, Gariaband District- Gariaband (Chhattisgarh)

4. District Education Officer, Gariaband District- Gariabandh (Chhattisgarh)

5. Block Education Officer, Chhura District- Gariabandh (Chhattisgarh)

6. Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Khadma, DistrictGariaband (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri AK Prasad, Advocate For Respondent-State :

Shri YS Thakur, Dy. AG for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 11/08/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as Upper Division Teacher in District Gariaband, is challenging his transfer from Government Higher Secondary School, Khadma, Development Block-Chhura, District Gariaband to Government Middle School, Gona, Development Block, Mainpur, District Gariaband, on administrative basis.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu