← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3691/2019disposed off

Bhushan Prasad Khunte v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-05-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.3691 of 2019

1. Bhushan Prasad Khunte S/o Shri Dauram Khunte Aged About 33 Years Presently Posted Assistant Teacher ( L.B.) Government Higher Secondary School Kotmi (D), Block Dabhra, District- Janigir-Champa, R/o Village Kotmi, Tahsil- Dabhra, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Sulochana Sidar W/o Shri Amilal Sidar Aged About 34 Years Presnetly Posted Assistant Teacher ( L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Kotmi (D), Block Dabhra, District- Janjgir-Champa, R/o Village Khaira, Block Dabhra, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. District Education Officer, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dabhra, District- JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh.

6. Block Education Officer, Dabhra , District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

7. Principal, Government Higher Secondary School Kotmi (D), Block Dabhra, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Shriya Mishra, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 14/05/2019

1. Learned counsel for petitioners undertakes that he shall cure the default during the course of day itself, therefore, with the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally at admission stage.

2. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

-23. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

4. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of.

5. The petitioner shall be entitled for the certified copy only after the default is removed.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder