← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3108/2019disposed off

Smt. Shashikala Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-04-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3108 of 2019 Smt. Shashikala Thakur W/o Rupesh Thakur Aged About 35 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher, Secondary School Arandi, Block Keshkal, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Hte Secretary, Department Of Panchyat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Kondagaon District Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Sameer Behar, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 29/04/2019

1. The instant Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved of the inaction on part of the respondents in not confirming the services of the petitioner though she has been appointed and working with the respondents since 2013 onwards.

2. According to the counsel for the petitioner, under the rules governing the field, the confirmation could not have been extended beyond the period of 5 years which in the present case also have been completed long back. He further submits that, till date, there is no order passed by the respondents so far as the claim of the petitioner is concerned, either entitling or disentitling her from the benefits.

3. Given the aforesaid submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the Writ Petition pending, rather ends of justice would meet if the Writ Petition is dispose off with a direction to the respondent No.3 to take a decision so far as the claim of the petitioner for confirmation is concerned.

4. Let this exercise be done within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit