Lalita Jaiswal And ORS v. Dheeraj Kumar Jaiswal
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
^ BM !•!» LN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Criminal Revision No.
*^-t ,)- of2011 APPLICANTS/ :1 Lalita Jaiswal, aged about 28 Petitioners years, W/o Dheeraj Kumar Jaiswal, D/o Bhaiyalal Jaiswal, caste Jaiswal, Occupation-House wife Upasana D/o Dheeraj Kumar Jaiswal, aged about 7 years, Babu S/o Dheeraj Kumar Jaiswal, aged about 3 years, No.2 & 3 are minors through Natural Guardian mother Lalita Jaiswal, -^f All R/o Village Kasara, P.S. Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, Distt.
Koria (C.G.)
VERSUS
NON-APPICANT Dheeraj Kumar Jaiswal, Respondent aged about years, S/o Satyanarayan Jaiswal, Caste Jaiswal, Occupation Contractor, R/o Village Sakaria, P.S.
& Tahsil Khadgava, Distt. Koria (C.G.) • Wss CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 19 (4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT K Hl
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISCrARH ATBILASITJR SB:- Hon'ble Shri Justice T.P. Sharma Criminal Revision No.717 of 2011 Applicants Lalifa Jaiswal Upasana Babu versus Dheeraj Kuniar Jaiswal Non-applicant Revision under Section 19f4) of Familv Courts Act Appearance:
Shri Tarique Haider, counsel for the appUcant.
None -for the respondent.
ORDER
(Passed on 20.12.2013) By this revision, the applicants have pray for quashment of order dated 31.10.2011 passed by Judge, Family«!g6grt, (Camp Court-Baikunthpur) in Criminal MJC No.58/10,rfwhereby the Court below has dismissed the application filed by the applicants under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
.s 2.
Heard on IA No.Ol, application for withdrawal of the revision.
3.
On due consideration, the application is allowed. 4.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. T.P. Sharma Judge Bini