← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4471/2015disposed off

Anita Shukla v. The Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited

2015-11-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4471 OF 2015 Anita Shukla aged about 52 years W/o Late Shri Pramod Kumar Shukla Resident of Kilaward Juna Bilaspur P.S. Kotwali Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (CG) ---Petitioner

Versus

1. The Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited through its Managing Director Daganiya Raipur District Raipur (CG)

2. The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited through its Director General Manager (HRD) Daganiya Raipur District Raipur (CG)

3. Executive Director Human Resources Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited Daganiya Raipur District Raipur (CG) ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents :

Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 30/11/2015 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that present case is covered by the decision rendered in Writ Petition (S) No.360/2015 (Raja Ram Kosle v. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited and others) vide order dated 08/04/2015, in which, this Court has observed in paragraph-9 as

under:- "9. For the foregoing, the present batch of writ petitions is disposed of in the following manner:- • The petitioners shall submit fresh representations within a period of one month, along with copies of the earlier applications filed by each of them and supporting documents before the Manager, HRD, Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya District Raipur.

• On such representations being filed, the respondents shall decide the same strictly in accordance with the policy dated 30.1.1997.

• It is made clear that while deciding the representations, the respondents would be at liberty to take into consideration the law laid down by the Supreme Court in various decisions as also the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.588/2013."

2.

Accepting the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of in similar terms as Writ Petition (S) No.360/2015.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Tiwari