M. Madhav v. Shri A. K. Garg
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT CASE (C ) No. 544 of 2015 • M. Madhav S/o Late Shri M. Balkrishna, Aged About 34 Years Occupation- UnEmployed, R/o Village Parasuram Ward, Behind Electricity OfÏce Bhatapara, Thana & Tahsil- Bhatapara, Civil & Revenue Distt.- Balodabajar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Shri A. K. Garg Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Shri S.R.Bandhey, Deputy General Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh .........(Contemnors) ---- Respondent And CONTEMPT CASE (C ) No. 545 Of 2015 • Sanjay Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Biselal Sahu, Aged About 30 Years Occupation- Un-Employed, R/o Village- Pirda, Post & Thana- Tumgaon, Civil & Revenue Distt.- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs
1. Shri A. K. Garg , Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Shri S.R.Bandhey, Deputy General Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh .........(Contemnors) ---- Respondent And CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. 546 Of 2015 • Kuleshawar Prasad Lodhi S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Lodhi, Aged About 35 Years Occupation- Un-Employed, R/o Village- Khamtarai, Post- Gullu, Tahsil & ThanaArang, Civil & Revenue Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs
1. Shri A. K. Garg Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Shri S.R.Bandhey, Deputy General Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh .........(Contemnors) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 9/12/2015 Heard.
(2) In similar contempt petition bearing CONT No.521 of 2015, arising out of the same common order passed in a batch of writ petitions, this Court has passed an order on 03.12.2015, allowing three months further time to the contemnors to decide the petitioner's representation in terms of the order passed by this Court in the writ petition in accordance with law.
(3) The present contempt petitions being similar, they are also disposed of in the same terms i.e. by allowing the respondents to decide the petitioners' representation in terms of the order passed by this Court in the writ petitions in accordance with law within a further period of three months.
(4) If the matter is not decided within the said period, the petitioners would be at liberty to move afresh before this Court. (5) The petitioners shall submit a copy of this order before the respondents within a period of 15 days. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna