← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWA/33/2015withdrawn

Prasant Singh Thakur And ORS. v. State Election Commission And ORS.

2015-01-30Hon'Ble The Acting Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker3 pages

--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT

BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT APPEAL N0. 33 /2015 APPELLANTS Prasant Singh Thakur, son of Lekhu Singh Thakur, aged about 32 years ,/2;

Akash Verma, son of Devsharn Verraa, aged about 24 years o\.< ^y.

Sarita Thakur, daughter of Lekhu vP^'ft^ 7.-^--<'..-- ^%--"""

^•"'fl^'""A'>'/ Singh Thakur, aged about \c years af.

Aruna Thakur, wife of Lekhu £• Singh Thakur, aged about years ^5.

Anjna Thakur, wife of Vinod Singh Thakur, aged about years All are resident ofVillage Nimora, Mandalpara Makan No.

H-4, Tahsil Abhanpur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur (C.G. P.0.

Raipur)

VERSUS

^1<'

State Election Commission RESPONDENTS Through: its Secretary, Infront of Old Mantralaya Raipur, P.S. Civil Line, P.0.

Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

District Retuming Officer, R/o Near Collector Office, PoUce

r^ Station Goal Bazar, Tahsil, District and Post Office Raipur, Chhattisgarh Tahsildar / Retuming Officer, 3.

Abhanpur, Tahsil Abhanpur, Police Station Abhanpur, P.0.

Abhanpur, District Raipiir, Chhattisgarh Collector Raipur, P.S. Goal Bazar, P.0. Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur, Chhattisgarh WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(lt OF THE "

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI PRITINKER DIWAKER, J.

WritAppeal No. 33 of 2015 APPELLANTS :

Prashant Singh Thakur & Others.

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS :

State Election Commission & Others.

WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT. 2006 Appearance: Shri Badruddin Khan, Advocate for the Appellants. Shri R.S.Marhas, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Shri J.K.Gilda, Advocate General for the State/ Respondent No^3.aticl4.,.:; ;:''

;'^:-:: ,•,:.•.

JUDGMENT

(30tl'ofJanuary,2015) Per Navin Sinha. ACa. C.J.

1.

Leave is sought to withdrawthe appeal for pursuing such remedies as theAppellant may beadvised.

2.

We make no observatipns withvegard to the same. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawh.

i -_.-..^--- Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge Sd/- Acting Chief Justice Amit