High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPT/74/2020disposed off

M/S Jaswani Automibiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India

2020-08-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 74 of 2020

1. M/s Jaswani Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. A Company Duly Incorporated Under The Companies Act, 1956 Having Its Office And Showroom At Jaswani Honda, Opposite Reliance Petrol Pump, Kharsiya Road, Ambikapur 497001 Through One Of Its Directors And Authorized Signatory, Shri Vinod Jaswani, S/o Shri Suresh Jaswani, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Jaswani Honda, Opposite Reliance Petrol Pump, Kharsiya Road, Ambikapur 497001, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India, Ministry Of Finance (Department Of Revenue) Through Secretary, New Delhi

2. The G S T Council Through The Secretary, G S T Council Secretariat, Vth Floor, Tower II, Jeevan Bharti Building, Janpath Road, Connaughat Place, New Delhi 110001

3. The Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs, North Block, Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of India, New Delhi 110001

4. Principal Commissioner, Central G S T And Central Excise Building, Tikrapara, Dhamtari Road, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Commissioner, State Goods And Services Tax, Civil Lines, Near Raj Bhawan, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Assistant Commissioner, G S T, Range- V, Division Raigarh, Trikon Chowk, Bhatti Road, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh -----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Neelabh Dubey, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 :

Mr. Himanshu Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, A.S.G.

For Resp. No. 2 & 4 :

Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate For Resp. No. 5 & 6 :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. Adv. General

-2Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 07.08.2020

1. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as of now, the writ petition may be disposed off granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court again, subject to outcome of the SLP No.7425-7428 of 2020 in a similar issue pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Delhi High Court.

2. The limited relief sought for by the counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul