← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMAC/1038/2016non prosecution

Natho Sahu v. Ramandeep Singh

2016-09-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Misc. Appeal (C) No. 1038 of 2016

1. Natho Sahu F/o Late Mangnu Sahu, Aged About 62 Years R/o- Ravi Bhavan, Near Shiv Mandir, House Of Aslam Tailor, Kota Basti, Poice Station Amanaka, Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).

2. Ku. Meera Sahu, D/o Natho Sahu, Aged About 17 Years (Minor Applicants No. 2 And 3 Are Represented By Appellant No. 1 Natho Sahu), R/o- Ravi Bhavan, Near Shiv Mandir, House Of Aslam Tailor, Kota Basti, Poice Station Amanaka, Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).

3. Vinod Sahu, S/o Natho Sahu, Aged About 15 Years (Minor Applicants No. 2 And 3 Are Represented By Appellant No. 1 Natho Sahu), R/oRavi Bhavan, Near Shiv Mandir, House Of Aslam Tailor, Kota Basti, Poice Station Amanaka, Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh),..... (Claimants).

---- Appellants

Versus

1. Ramandeep Singh S/o Pratap Singh, Occupation- Hindustan Goods Carrier, Ring Road No. 1, T.R. Nagar, Tatiband, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh),.......(Non-Applicant-No-1)

2. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Through- Branch Manager, Branch Office, Fourth Floor, Ravi Bhavan, Jaystambh Chowk, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh), Policy No. 2303702334002087, Cover Note No. - 110001329797, Due Date- 26.02.2012.

---- Respondents For the Appellants :

None.

For the Respondents :

None.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Order on Board 23/09/2016 1.

None appears on behalf of the appellants even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round.

2.

In this circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

3.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) Judge Nimmi