Smt. Devika Uieke v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1392 of 2018 Smt. Devika Uieke, w/o Dilip Uieke, aged about 33 years, Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, Sulaoini, Tehsil Masturi, Revenue and Civil Dist- Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Department of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Tehsil and Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

The Collector, Collector Office Bilaspur, Tehsil and District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3.

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, Tehsil Revenue and Civil District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4.

Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayhat- Masturi, Tehsil, Revenue and Civil District, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

6.

Ram Hari Sahu, S/o Kanhiaya Lal Sahu, r/o Village Sulauni, Tehsil Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 7.

Smt. Sudama Bai widow of Late Dhiraji, r/o Village Sulauni, Tehsil Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Shrivastava, Advocate. For State : Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 15/05/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the Chief Executive Officer has directed the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) to initiate departmental proceedings against the petitioner whereas the issue in question has already been decided in favour of the petitioner. (2) In view of above, the petitioner is at liberty to file copy of proceedings before the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) and, in turn, the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) shall

consider and decide the same in accordance with law before proceeding further with the matter.

(3) In view of above, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge d/-