High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/548/2016non prosecution

Premlal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-09-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 548 of 2016

1. Premlal Sahu S/O Shri Shivram Sahu, Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat) Government Hr. Sec. School, Sankara, Tehsil- Nagri, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh)

2. Mukesh Kumar, S/O Shri Balram Sahu, Aged About 44 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat) Government Hr. Sec. School, Tangapani, Tehsil- Nagri, District- Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Naresh Chandra Som, S/O Shri Domar Singh Som, Aged About 43 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat) Government Hr. Sec. School, Belargaon, Tehsil- Nagri, District- Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Mannulal, S/O Shri Sadaram Sahu, Aged About 46 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat) Government Hr. Sec. School, Ghutkel, Tehsil- Nagri, District- Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh),.......(Appellant) ---- Applicants

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Department Of Finance, Through Its Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Directorate Of Panchayat, Through Its Director, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Zila Panchayat Dhamtari, Through The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Office, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Khijan Lal Sahu, S/O Shri Ramnath Sahu, Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat), Government High School, Devpur, Tehsil- Nagri, District- Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For applicants : None present For Respondents : None present Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board Per P. Diwaker, J

06.09.2016 None appears for the applicants even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round.

In this circumstances, we are left with no other option except to dismiss the MCC for want of prosecution. 3.

Accordingly, the MCC is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE JUDGE Bini