← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1700/2020disposed off

Sukdeo Prasad v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1700 of 2020

1. Sukdeo Prasad, S/o Late Lakmi Prasad, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village- Bilaspur, Tahsil- Kharsia, District Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Kharsia District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. The Tahsildar, Kharsia District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh -----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj K. Sinha, Advocate For State :

Mr. Siddharth Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02.09.2020

1. The default pointed out by the Registry as of now, stands ignored. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard on admission.

2. The limited relief that the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for a direction to the Respondent No. 4 to decide the application which the petitioner has made in-respect-of the correction in the revenue records; so far as land bearing Khasra No. 1⁄2, 2/2 and 154/2 measuring 0.6070 hectare at Village: Bilaspur, Tahsil: Kharsiya, District: Raigarh are concerned.

3. The limited request that the counsel for the petitioner has made is not opposed by the State Counsel.

-24. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off, directing the Respondent No. 4 to immediately process the application filed by the petitioner for correction in the revenue records in-respect-of the aforesaid property after due verification of the facts from the official records. If required, the petitioner may also be granted an opportunity to establish his claim over the said property.

5. Let this exercise be concluded within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case; so far as the claim which the petitioner is making.

6. The present writ petition, accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul