Mayank Thakur @ Dadu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4263 of 2020 • Mayank Thakur @ Dadu, S/o Khomlal Thakur, Aged About 18 Years, R/o House No. 112/H, Risali Sector, Bhilai, Near BSF Office, P.S.- Nevai, Tehsil & District- Durg (C. G.).

---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through- S.H.O. Nevai, District- Durg (C. G.). ---- Respondent For Applicant : Mr. B. P. Singh, Adv.

For Respondent/State : Mr. Rahul Jha, G.A.

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 17.08.2020

1. The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 189/2019 registered at Police Station- Nevai, District- Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 411, 34 of IPC.

2. The prosecution story, in brief is that, complainant lodged a report alleging that on 10.08.2019, he went to his village and on 12.08.2019, his neighbour informed that lock of his house was broken and then the neighbour inspected his house and found that some golden and silver ornaments and some cash were stolen by the unknown person. Thereafter, offence has been registered against the present applicant and he has been taken into custody.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that the charge-sheet has been filed and except memorandum, nothing has been seized against the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 12.10.2019 and there is no likelihood of his

case being decided in near future, therefore, the present applicant may be released on bail.

4. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application and the submission made in this respect. It is submitted that 12 other cases of same nature have been registered against the present applicant, therefore, no case is made out for grant of bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6. Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, and further considering the facts that the charge-sheet has been filed and except memorandum, nothing has been seized against the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 12.10.2019 and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

7. Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-, with one local surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Ruchi